I received some negative feedback on a recent paper submission stating that my results would not be reproducible. However, I took care to only use easily accessible, public benchmark data and wrote code to make it easy for anyone to reproduce my results. I did remove the GitHub link to the code in my submission to preserve anonymity (stating in the submission that this was the reason for not providing a functioning link). What is the best way to handle this in the future without compromising double or triple blind reviewing? Especially if the code should remain private until acceptance.