Join our meetup, learn, connect, share, and get to know your Toronto AI community.
Browse through the latest deep learning, ai, machine learning postings from Indeed for the GTA.
Are you looking to sponsor space, be a speaker, or volunteer, feel free to give us a shout.
I came across the paper of Wachter, Mittelstadt, et al, who propose Counterfactual Explanations as remedy against the opacity of ML decision-making (see e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00399 or https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3278331).
I am a lawyer myself and cannot assess the technical feasibility of this approach. How would you, Ml experts, evaluate their idea? I am really looking forward to your thoughts and insights.
(If this was already subject to discussion elsewhere please kindly direct me to the post).
submitted by /u/Everdream13
[link] [comments]