Skip to main content

Blog

Learn About Our Meetup

5000+ Members

MEETUPS

LEARN, CONNECT, SHARE

Join our meetup, learn, connect, share, and get to know your Toronto AI community. 

JOB POSTINGS

INDEED POSTINGS

Browse through the latest deep learning, ai, machine learning postings from Indeed for the GTA.

CONTACT

CONNECT WITH US

Are you looking to sponsor space, be a speaker, or volunteer, feel free to give us a shout.

[D] Many papers don’t do hyperparameter search on DNN baselines

A thing that I recognized after reading various DNN model papers is that they often don’t seem to perform hyperparameter search on their / baseline models. Many reported results seem to be for hand-picked configurations only. No search methods (like grid search, Bayesian optimization or even random search) have been used to find the best-performing configurations.

IMO this is a problem: The performance of a DNN models really depends on the choice of hyperparameters, so hypothetically you could make a baseline model perform badly by picking poor hyperparameters.

Why are so many big papers with such an incomplete evaluation out there? Or am I missing something here and it is enough to look at one configuration only?

submitted by /u/alex19111
[link] [comments]