Join our meetup, learn, connect, share, and get to know your Toronto AI community.
Browse through the latest deep learning, ai, machine learning postings from Indeed for the GTA.
Are you looking to sponsor space, be a speaker, or volunteer, feel free to give us a shout.
What’s going on here? I have not found a single paper that reproduces or compares against the results shown in Table 4 of the original residual network paper. All papers report significantly worse numbers.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.03385.pdf
top1 err numbers from the paper:
ResNet-50 @ 20.74
ResNet-101 @ 19.87
ResNet-152 @ 19.38
This paper have 20,000+ citations. DenseNet (https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.06993, 3000+ citations) and Wide ResNets (https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.07146, ~1000 citations) don’t use this result. Not even one of Kaiming He’s recent papers (https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01569) use this result. Since I’m new to the community, maybe I’m missing something here. But isn’t this paper one of the most cited pieces of work in the field??
submitted by /u/CatchADragonFish
[link] [comments]