Skip to main content

Blog

Learn About Our Meetup

5000+ Members

MEETUPS

LEARN, CONNECT, SHARE

Join our meetup, learn, connect, share, and get to know your Toronto AI community. 

JOB POSTINGS

INDEED POSTINGS

Browse through the latest deep learning, ai, machine learning postings from Indeed for the GTA.

CONTACT

CONNECT WITH US

Are you looking to sponsor space, be a speaker, or volunteer, feel free to give us a shout.

Author: torontoai

[R] World Wide Technology’s AI R&D Program – White Papers

This is our first post to reddit from World Wide Technology’s Business and Analytics Advisors team, and this thread seemed like the right place to start. We would love to get everyone’s thoughts on our AI R&D program we started about a year and half ago, in particular the white papers we have been publishing on our website. Our data science and engineering teams have been working diligently on topics we know our customers are only thinking about now (or will be thinking about soon), and will probably be a reality in 3-5 years. We want to stay ahead of the market and make sure we are learning and sharing our findings across a number of areas. This is a blog post talking about why we are doing R&D and at the bottom are links to the abstracts of the 6 papers we have published so far. Please kindly register for the website to download the papers. We promise we won’t bombard you with spam!

We look forward to your thoughts!

https://www.wwt.com/all-blog/uncovering-ai-research-development/

submitted by /u/wwtAI-Research
[link] [comments]

[D] XGBoost Custom Objective

I have seen that for xgboost you can write your own loss function, and have even seen the example on the xgboost github. What I am wondering is there an example somewhere about how to go about developing that code?

In other words, say I have some metric (other than say squared loss) that I want my model to optimize and use to determine the weights. It looks like I need to determine the gradient and hessian, but I’m not sure how to figure this out.

submitted by /u/mydogissnoring
[link] [comments]

[D] Adding more data will make the model perform worse ?

Hi, I am using XGboost regressor for a personal project. Initially I used a data set with measurements from 01.Jan.2016 to 24.Dec.2018 and I got those results : MAE = 2.332 , MSE = 7.764 for testing data. I recently got from the same source, the same data set but with measurements from 01.Jan.2016 up to 14.May.2019 and for testing data I got those results : MAE = 2.729 , MSE = 12.002. I have tuned the hyperparameters, in both cases, using the same method through cv. I tried to adjust the parameters more for the second data set but I did not get better results. Even if the differences are not very high, the fact that I used a larger data set could have affected the performance or is something I have overlooked?

submitted by /u/Bigdey
[link] [comments]

[D] Ask Reddit: How to interview a ML candidates if I’m not an ML expert?

I’ve been assigned by my company to interview some ML research & engineer candidates. However, I myself am not an ML expert, although I’m fairly familiar with ML at the “hobbyist” level. For instance, I’ve implemented RL algorithms in Pytorch and I’m comfortable reading many ML papers, but I’m still struggling to understand Transformer. Outside of ML I would consider myself fairly strong in C++/Python, probably more so than the average ML candidate.

How can a non-ML-expert effectively interview ML candidates? What questions would you ask? If you were applying, what questions would you want someone who isn’t an ML expert to ask you?

submitted by /u/hazard02
[link] [comments]

[D] ML Terminology in Clinical Prediction as well as the consequence of certain predictors being weighted the most important

I was recently reading this paper:

Predicting suicide attempts in adolescents with longitudinal clinical data and machine learning

First thing I wanted to discuss was the use of the term control. They had 3 “control groups” (OSI, Depressed, General) and they had a group of cases. In terms of model construction and validation they say:

A total of 1,470 adolescents with ICD codes for suicide and self-inflicted injury (i.e. E950–E959) were identified for model development and validation.

So to my understanding, they built the model using cases and OSI, then when testing discrimination, they mix in the cases with the control group of interest to see how well they can identify them? Or based on the general aim of their paper, are they trying to detect suicide attempts within the controls. I don’t necessarily see this because they don’t state how many true cases are within each group. I’m used to the use of controls in terms of measuring an effect of a treatment and less so in terms of prediction models (I’m more used to training vs testing datasets or people not even doing that).

Another confusing issue, was the fact that they used their control (OSI) as part of the model development and validation. Generally speaking, shouldn’t it be separate (i.e. you have training and testing). I was also confused by their Figures 4A-B in terms of “depressed control comparison” (4A) vs “general control comparison” (4B). I thought the only thing being compared is cases to controls.

Finally, I’m not sure how much of a concern this is, but I found it interesting (see charts) that BMI and Age were generally some of the best predictors. In a sense, while the algorithms don’t care and will just choose what best discriminates, I find it concerning that these kind of superficial predictors, which in some ways (more so BMI than age) have little to do with suicide attempts, are considered the most powerful. I am not sure if this kind of information implies anything about the generalizability of the model where one wouldn’t be able to find such systematic difference in terms of BMI and Age.

submitted by /u/slimuser98
[link] [comments]

[D] Machine Learning – WAYR (What Are You Reading) – Week 64

This is a place to share machine learning research papers, journals, and articles that you’re reading this week. If it relates to what you’re researching, by all means elaborate and give us your insight, otherwise it could just be an interesting paper you’ve read.

Please try to provide some insight from your understanding and please don’t post things which are present in wiki.

Preferably you should link the arxiv page (not the PDF, you can easily access the PDF from the summary page but not the other way around) or any other pertinent links.

Previous weeks :

1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70
Week 1 Week 11 Week 21 Week 31 Week 41 Week 51 Week 61
Week 2 Week 12 Week 22 Week 32 Week 42 Week 52 Week 62
Week 3 Week 13 Week 23 Week 33 Week 43 Week 53 Week 63
Week 4 Week 14 Week 24 Week 34 Week 44 Week 54
Week 5 Week 15 Week 25 Week 35 Week 45 Week 55
Week 6 Week 16 Week 26 Week 36 Week 46 Week 56
Week 7 Week 17 Week 27 Week 37 Week 47 Week 57
Week 8 Week 18 Week 28 Week 38 Week 48 Week 58
Week 9 Week 19 Week 29 Week 39 Week 49 Week 59
Week 10 Week 20 Week 30 Week 40 Week 50 Week 60

Most upvoted papers two weeks ago:

/u/mowrilow: This website

Besides that, there are no rules, have fun.

submitted by /u/ML_WAYR_bot
[link] [comments]