Skip to main content

Blog

Learn About Our Meetup

5000+ Members

MEETUPS

LEARN, CONNECT, SHARE

Join our meetup, learn, connect, share, and get to know your Toronto AI community. 

JOB POSTINGS

INDEED POSTINGS

Browse through the latest deep learning, ai, machine learning postings from Indeed for the GTA.

CONTACT

CONNECT WITH US

Are you looking to sponsor space, be a speaker, or volunteer, feel free to give us a shout.

[Discussion]Why CycleGAN does not need randomness as input?

I understand that CycleGAN is trying to learn a deterministic mapping between the two domains. However, in the case of conditional GAN (cGAN), if there is no randomness in the generator, the discriminator will get overfitting, and consequently generator will not improve (as discussed in the following link).

https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/6k4sqj/discussion_what_is_the_purpose_of_noise_in_a/

Why the same overfitting problem does not cause trouble to CycleGAN? Is it between the input dataset to CycleGAN is versatile enough to prevent discriminator from overfitting?

submitted by /u/sychen52
[link] [comments]